Home About Us The Settlement Process Services & Costs Blog Contact Us
Join our email list
Subscribe

Blog

Sep 30

$558,000 says we will NEVER provide Bank BSB & Account numbers in an email

The vulnerabilities of our modern electronic communication and commerce practices were recently thrown into very clear view with the emergence of something called the “man in the middle” scam.

Using very common modern business practice, a Perth settlement agent sent an email to their buyer client requesting transfer of the balance of the purchase funds for a new house. The email contained the amount to be paid ($558,000) as well as the banking BSB and account numbers for the settlement agent’s trust account.

The email was intercepted by a “man in the middle” scammer and replaced by an otherwise identical email except that the banking details had been changed such that the buyer transferred his $558,000 to someone else who promptly transferred it overseas.

Investigations are proceeding but at this stage it looks like the buyer has lost his $558,000 and the settlement agent probably wasn’t professionally negligent and therefore has no claim against his professional indemnity insurance. It is also likely that the money wasn’t lost as a result of defalcation by the settlement agent and therefore any claim would be unsuccessful to the Fidelity Guarantee Account established under the Settlement Agents Act.

This devastating nightmare scenario opens a whole pandora’s box as to the way modern business is conducted, especially between individuals and business. We can no longer ignore the risks of sending sensitive information by email. In this case, the settlement agent and their client have simply operated on the basis that emails are safe. Clearly they are not, as the buyer has found to his immense, $558,000 cost.

So how do we at Goldfields Settlements deal with this? As a licensed professional, I’m still grappling with the full ramifications, but as start, we will now never send our banking details via email. We are also in the process of establishing a BPay facility to reduce the risk somewhat. But in the end, there is no substitute for eternal vigilance and checking the recipient’s banking details before you transfer funds, EVERY TIME.

The above is general information only and should not be relied on as legal advice.

This article first appeared in The Kalgoorlie Miner  Real Estate section on SAturday 30 September 2017


More Articles

Sep 2

Conditions precedent beat warranties hands down

Lawyers use a term "condition precedent" to mean something that must be done before the contract can conclude. Now I hasten to add, that as a mere humble settlement agent, I am not a lawyer and nothing I say should be construed as legal advice. But the point should be made that cond... continue reading


Jul 31

Buying a house – YOU are responsible for the terms of the contract.

Why do people rush headlong into spending $250,000 or $300,000 plus on a house without making even the most basic attempts to protect themselves? I guess it’s because we’ve become used to the protections that consumer law brings us. But consumer law doesn’t really apply to h... continue reading


Aug 16

Buying off the plan or from mortgagees: what could possibly go wrong!

Here's a bit of advice for free from a bloke who's seen good trusting folk taken to the cleaners a few times: DON'T SIGN ANYTHING YOU DON'T FULLY UNDERSTAND. I'm sure you've heard all this before, but don't just assume it's all good. Just don't do it. Doin... continue reading


May 25

Don't get whacked with stamp duty if your deal falls through!

Do you know you can be whacked with transfer duty even if you don't proceed with a property purchase? That's right. Your liability for transfer duty (ie stamp duty) arises when you SIGN A CONTRACT to buy a house or other dutiable property, not when you proceed to settlement. Exemp... continue reading


Oct 27

The "what, who, when, how and what if" of contract clauses.

Contract clauses need to be clear.   Clauses that simply say "subject to a white ant inspection" or "subject to due diligence" (whatever that means) are just waffle. They are completely meaningless and open to all manner of interpretation dependi... continue reading


View older articles in Blog Archive

Independent • Local • Thorough